Am I alone in thinking this is a trivial matter ? Of the 3 cars the Idle household has had with DPFs only one has ever regenerated its DPF (the awful 170PD Audi when very new) and even that only did it once to my knowledge.
When SWMBO was in the market for a Golf we opted for the TSi to avoid DPFs and because she did such a low mileage, IIRC whilst the salesperson didn't specifically 'cite the DPF, they recommended the TSi as the car would likely be very low mileage (3 or 4K PA) so the additional cost of a diesel couldn't be justified.
The simple fact is that ALL cars cost (quite a lot of) money to run, if that means spending 2 Pounds on a 10 minute 60mph drive 'for the sake of it' once a fortnight what's the big deal ? Surely if this is too much money then that particular car is not a sensible use of your limited resources?
Wasn't the same argument about the cost/likelihood of failure applied to Catalytic Converters when they were first introduced, then maybe to aircon as it became ubiquitous and no-doubt ABS and airbags too?
There is no mis-selling, caveat emptor surely......
Last edited by: idle_chatterer on Mon 16 Jul 12 at 03:47
|