Non-motoring > Another One Bites the Dust Miscellaneous
Thread Author: CGNorwich Replies: 196

 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
Damian Green has “resigned”. I wonder if David Davis will resign as threatened.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
Having porn on your computer ten years ago is one thing. Giving inaccurate and misleading statements to the Cabinet Secretary is altogether another.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/20/damian-green-resigns-as-first-secretary-of-state-after-porn-allegations
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
Bet his pants were on fire at the time.
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
I bet more than a couple of ex-Met Bobbies are rubbing their hands in glee. Untouchable he seems to think he was..
 Another One Bites the Dust - Stuartli
I'll lay a pound to a penny that "There but for the grace of God go I" or "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" applies to more than a few of those that see fit to criticise.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
One of the "Charges" against him was that he made a pass at journalist Kate Maltby by brushing his hand across her knee. The poor woman, I hope she wasn't too deeply traumatised by such a horrifying assault.
 Another One Bites the Dust - MD
She wants to think herself lucky it ain’t the 1970’s

As a youngster in many jobs, I had to watch the older women as they could be quite predatory. Strangely enjoyable though:-)
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> One of the "Charges" against him was that he made a pass at journalist Kate
>> Maltby by brushing his hand across her knee. The poor woman, I hope she wasn't
>> too deeply traumatised by such a horrifying assault.

>> She wants to think herself lucky it ain’t the 1970’s

But it's not the 1970s. The world has moved on.

So how about if she'd been Kate O' Reliant or Kate Devon?

The inquiry found her a plausible witness but as it was 1:1 no definitive conclusion.

It wasn't that or the porn on his PC that got him though.

The killer was telling what were effectively lies.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
>> The killer was telling what were effectively lies.

Come off it Brompt, he made a pass at a woman. Nothing we haven't all done from time to time, sometimes successful, sometimes not. In either case the alleged offences were to trivial to be worth more than a mention.

You are right though when you say it was lying about it that cost him his job, as always it is the cover up that kills.
Last edited by: VxFan on Fri 22 Dec 17 at 02:10
 Another One Bites the Dust - Zero
Two wrongs at work here. The police should be trusted to keep their traps shut. - If a porn offence has been committed it should be used in evidence at the right time and the right place, not by some old copper earning a few grubby quid from the news of the world.

Secondly politicians really are the most stupid arrogant morons on the planet, is this the first time one has been caught out telling porkies? No, does it always end in tears? yes, have they/will they learn from this? no.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Manatee
>>Secondly politicians really are the most stupid arrogant morons on the planet,

The same thought has occurred to me many times. Astonishing hubris. Any normal person would assume they couldn't get away with it. Not just politicians though. People who think they have power.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Two wrongs at work here. The police should be trusted to keep their traps shut.
>> - If a porn offence has been committed it should be used in evidence at
>> the right time and the right place, not by some old copper earning a few
>> grubby quid from the news of the world.

Quite right. There is, whatever the prudes or sensationalist press say, no criminal offence in watching consenting actors playing out a straightforward scenario of legitimate sexual activity.

OTOH it's difficult to justify observing such activity to one's constituents.....
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
No, does it always end in tears?

That's what all the tissues were for then !
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
The problem with that is we don't know how often they tell lies and get away with it. A lot more frequently than you think I suspect. Lying in politics and indeed life in general can be a very effective strategy.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Fullchat
"Two wrongs at work here. The police should be trusted to keep their traps shut."

That's just what they want the public to believe and the default position is that they are ok because generally Cops don't go running to the press telling tales as they have to conform to a code of discipline, unlike themselves.

Bob Quick was given the poison chalice of the Leveson inquiry. Whichever way he turned he was thwarted by what appears to be the old boy network. Then had his honesty, integrity and professionalism questioned in public.

There is something bubbling in the background which has made them come forward. Why would any Copper keep records form a previous investigation and an original pocket book if they did not think they might need them as some form of insurance or they might need to expose something bigger later on?
Last edited by: Fullchat on Sat 23 Dec 17 at 01:05
 Another One Bites the Dust - tyrednemotional
...I have little doubt that Quick departed the police force holding a grudge, and that the overall background to the case gives enough fuel and traction to throw much pressure back onto the police to provide a convenient diversionary story. (much like the current-running diversionary story on the return of the blue passport; you know, the one we could have had all along)

It may well yet come to blow up on the Government however.

There are a number of media outlets that have chosen not to run with it at headline level, and, if the (alternate) story based on their published "facts" are to be believed, then things look rather different.

I'm not sure I agree with all the sentiment in the Guardian summary here, but if the underlying "facts" and timeline are taken at face value, it tells a rather different story.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/22/damian-green-case-former-police-officers-public-interest-brian-paddick

The document comprising the "leak" is of interest, as it doesn't appear to be an official police document at all, but an unused draft input to the Leveson Inquiry. Whilst Quick must circumstantially be the main suspect as the source, he denies it, and there appears to be no evidence that he is the culprit. His further involvement was post that revelation, in private, and to the official inquiry.

Lewis, subsequently put in his penn'orth after Green had publicly attacked by Quick. In the circumstances, and with the knowledge I had, I'm not sure I wouldn't have done the same.

I'm not sure if Quick is still continuing with his threatened action against Green for the "defamatory comments", but if he is, I would assess that he is confident that no-one will find evidence of any involvement in the initial leak, since this is probably the only weak point any defence could choose to pursue to justify the "defamatory comments". Be interesting to see...

I can't help but feel that "people in glass houses......". From reading of the history, Green's part in the original inquiry into leaks his department was receiving looks(to me) very grubby. I suspect Quick thought he would catch a big fish, but instead became tangled up in politics.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Come off it Brompt, he made a pass at a woman. Nothing we haven't all
>> done from time to time, sometimes successful, sometimes not. In either case the alleged offences
>> were to trivial to be worth more than a mention.

The woman he made a pass at was young enough to be his daughter and was (IIRC) daughter of family friends.

It makes a difference.


 Another One Bites the Dust - MD
On reflection Bromp, you’re right.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Mapmaker
>> The woman he made a pass at was young enough to be his daughter and
>> was (IIRC) daughter of family friends.
>>
>> It makes a difference.

What is the maximum acceptable age difference, do you think, and do you think it should be legislated? And if not, then what difference does it make?
 Another One Bites the Dust - Ambo
As far as using work computers for personal use is concerned, "There but for the grace of God go I" must apply to most people in employment nowadays but hadn't Green heard of the Delete button?
 Another One Bites the Dust - commerdriver
>> As far as using work computers for personal use is concerned, "There but for the
>> grace of God go I" must apply to most people in employment nowadays but hadn't
>> Green heard of the Delete button?
>>

there is a huge difference between personal use such as internet / banking online etc with a work computer which many employers including mine will not object to, treating it as incidental to the day's work and using a work computer to access porn or anything else of that sort which, quite rightly is a dismissible offence, no nonsense.

Additionally, there is, anecdotaly, a bit of a culture of shared passwords etc in some places, including political circles, which is stupid in modern IT use
Last edited by: commerdriver on Fri 22 Dec 17 at 11:16
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
>> The woman he made a pass at was young enough to be his daughter and
>> was (IIRC) daughter of family friends.
>>
>> It makes a difference.

No it doesn't. She was an adult no matter what the age difference and many people in the entertainment business have lovers young enough to be there great grand daughters without anyone batting an eyelid. It didn't stop Mick Jagger getting a knighthood, for example.

Where do you draw the line at family friends, mates sister for example? He made a pass, she rejected it and that was that. Listening to many people interviewed in the media over the past week as many women as men think the whole thing is a fuss over nothing, the lying accepted. There is a national sense of guilt over past treatment of sexual assault victims by police and other institutions that is in danger of going too far and demonising anyone everyone who shows any sexual interest in someone outside a very narrow band of "Correct" potential partners.
Last edited by: VxFan on Sat 23 Dec 17 at 20:49
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
Very well said R o R.

Ian is 27 years younger than I am. It's out 10th wedding Anniversary today.

If we're going to start taking age into account then I presume some will have a problem with us?

It's getting ridiculous now.

Pat.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Ian is 27 years younger than I am. It's out 10th wedding Anniversary today.

That's great for both of, no issue whatever with age difference. Doing benefit advice at work couples with large age gaps (both ways) is something I see all the time.

Thinking about it some more age is only part of the problem in the Green/Maltby scenario. Making a pass at a much younger woman in a social scenario is one thing, though not without it's risks. Doing it when she's asking you, as a powerful senior politician, for advice on her political ambitions is something else.

It's all to easy for it to be perceived as a transactional request; sex in exchange for career advancement.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Sun 24 Dec 17 at 09:33
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
>> It's all to easy for it to be perceived as a transactional request; sex in
>> exchange for career advancement.

And doing it because you fancy her and you want to see if she fancies you is is yet another thing. It does happen, you know.
Last edited by: VxFan on Sun 24 Dec 17 at 19:51
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> And doing it because you fancy her and you want to see if she fancies
>> you is is yet another thing. It does happen, you know.

I don't deny it happens. Just that on balance of probability I don't think it was case here. And there's plenty of evidence that for a young woman in Westminster being propositioned like this (ie by older and more powerful men) is too frequent to be written off as 'a pass'.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
>>
>>
>> I don't deny it happens. Just that on balance of probability I don't think it
>> was case here. And there's plenty of evidence that for a young woman in Westminster
>> being propositioned like this (ie by older and more powerful men) is too frequent to
>> be written off as 'a pass'.
>>
Women are propositioned by men every minute of the day (And vice versa). In the vest majority of cases the man is older than the woman in a relationship, and no matter what the alleged power imbalance might be provided no is taken for an answer when given and it does not persist to the discomfort of the woman involved their is no case to answer.

We're almost getting to the stage where a relationship is only deemed proper when it is preceeded by an exchange of solicitors letters and vetting by the social services.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Women are propositioned by men every minute of the day (And vice versa). In the
>> vest majority of cases the man is older than the woman in a relationship, and
>> no matter what the alleged power imbalance might be provided no is taken for an
>> answer when given and it does not persist to the discomfort of the woman involved
>> their is no case to answer.

You've got previous in here for excusing sex offenders and minimising the effect of their actions.

I'll leave the above to stand in the same vein.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Robin O'Reliant
>> You've got previous in here for excusing sex offenders and minimising the effect of their
>> actions.
>> I'll leave the above to stand in the same vein.

Damian Green is NOT a sex offender, and to suggest his actions made him so is stretching the envelope to a laughable degree.

And no I have not got "Previous for excusing sex offenders", just a different view of what constitutes a sex offence to you.
Last edited by: VxFan on Wed 27 Dec 17 at 01:43
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
When you say "you've got previous", I assume that some trendy, pseudo Sweeney-esque phrase meaning that somebody has done the same before? No chance you could go for something a little less grating?

RO'R said

"Women are propositioned by men every minute of the day (And vice versa). In the vest majority of cases the man is older than the woman in a relationship, and no matter what the alleged power imbalance might be provided no is taken for an answer when given and it does not persist to the discomfort of the woman involved their is no case to answer."


For the life of me I cannot see what is wrong with that paragraph. Have you never been propositioned? Have you never propositioned another? I'd assume so. Was that proposition not a leap in faith?

I propositioned a woman *much* younger than me, it was in the workplace, she worked for someone who worked for someone who worked for someone who worked for someone who reported to me.

We've been married a long time and have lovely children together.

So was that right or wrong? Because I'd only got a hope for what she'd say, and I've been wrong about pretty much everything else she'd say since.

But if she'd declined, it would have ended there and I would have accepted her decision. Despite the fact that never mind her own job, I could have closed or kept open her entire country operation if I chose without really needing to justifying it to anybody, and she knew that was why I'd been sent.

What, exactly, is wrong with that?

I'd guess you're back to "sniffing" again.

Men and women, and other combinations, interact. At times we find each other attractive. At times that's at work. I can see no harm as long as it is genuine and there are no inappropriate implications.

p.s. As it happens, I can't remember Mr. O'Reliant ever excusing sex offenders. Perhaps you mean that he has a habit of pointing out the utter ridiculousness or your position at times?
 Another One Bites the Dust - smokie
"...sex in exchange for career advancement."

...and I'd assumed you'd made it on sheer unadulterated ability. You live and learn

LOL
 Another One Bites the Dust - Roger.
All elected politicians lie - firstly to get elected, secondly to remain in office and thirdly, because it's in their nature.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
>>All elected politicians lie - firstly to get elected,<<

Pedant mode...surely a contradiction of terms there?

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - Manatee
As a pedant, that's very pedantic. Well done:)
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
I'm usually too polite to point it out but as everyone else seems to be in Bah Humbug mode, I thought I'd join them too:)

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
When I made this post I was actually interested in the political effect of the resignation of the main supporter of Theresa May and how it would affect her strategy for the ongoing negotiations or even lead to a change in leadership.

Obvioulsy no one else is
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
Well, given as the whole debacle has been pretty random I would suggest "not much"
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
I'm not so sure. May has few real supporters and is still there as leader basically because no one else want the job. The latest fudge has bought her a bit more time but the infighting is surely going to break out again fairly shortly. Damian Green was in fact a major source of moderation between the two sides, more so that Theresa May and I can see here being forced to quit.

Indeed I think she will be happy to go. She is looking very tired and her ongoing illness is not helping.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
I'm no supporter of Teresa may but I have to disagree.

I think she will feel she has let everyone down if she has to go because of her illness and I do think all the speculation about that in the media is more wishful thinking tham anything.

She has coped with it for a long time and led a full an successful career, no reason to pin point it now surely?

She set out to deal with Brexit and more than anything she wants to see it through.

I think she's the vest person to do this,

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
I rather think events are going to overtake here whatever her wishes. The leave wing of the party will stage some sort of challenge in the new year. They fear being swept along in some sort of Norwegian type arrangement which is where we are heading.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
But if I were in her shoes I would rather be replaced because of that than a failing of my body parts.

I can fully understand that and I do wonder if the speculation about her heath would have been so prominent if she had been a male.

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
I think I've missed it, (or forgotten) what is it that's wrong with her health?
 Another One Bites the Dust - Lygonos
Good diabetes - insulin dependent.

Not the Bad diabetes that fat lazy people get...

Reminds me of...


www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3xUjw2BCYE


 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat
....and there really are people out there who believe that!

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - Hard Cheese
>> Good diabetes - insulin dependent.
>>
>> Not the Bad diabetes that fat lazy people get...
>>

Is that opinion or irony?

 Another One Bites the Dust - Lygonos
>>Is that opinion or irony?

Probably
 Another One Bites the Dust - Zero
>> I think I've missed it, (or forgotten) what is it that's wrong with her health?
>>

She is female, must be the menopause.
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
There has been very little press speculation about Theresa May’s health. I can’t remember seeing any recently although she does not look a well woman.

There has on the other hand been an enormous amount of speculation about Donald Trump who is, I believe, male.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Pat

>>Donald Trump who is, I believe, male<<

You're not sure?

Pat
 Another One Bites the Dust - tyrednemotional
>> You're not sure?
>>

...I'm not even sure he's human......
 Another One Bites the Dust - Zero
>> >> You're not sure?
>> >>
>>
>> ...I'm not even sure he's human......

Hes not

www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2017/12/20/disney-worlds-trump-robot-has-been-the-object-of-ridicule-heres-what-would-make-it-better/?utm_term=.9029479c7659
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
>> There has been very little press speculation about Theresa May’s health. I can’t remember seeing
>> any recently although she does not look a well woman.
>>

I was thinking the same.
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
Gordon Brown is a man Pat.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/sep/28/rumours-gordon-brown-health-blog
 Another One Bites the Dust - Hard Cheese
There are four points here:

While pornography might not be to everyones taste the porn in question was apparently quite legal.

The policemen in question quite wrongly attempted to discredit a government minister by disclosing the details of the porn being found although no offence had been committed.

In this day and age there is nothing wrong with a man making a pass at a woman, all she needed to do was reject him, there was absolutely no reason for her to go public.

Aside from all of the above it seems that Damian Green was not completely truthful when asked about the porn being found on his computer, despite it being quite legal, and that is why he was asked to resign.
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
Senior politicians (or anyone in public service for that matter) downloading porn onto a work computer isn't something I'd consider wholesome in all in my opinion. At the very least it's a security risk. The porn in question was "legal" then and isn't now tells you something about its nature...

The fact that this man lied to cover his tracks tells you something more about his integrity - can't we expect integrity in politics ?

I think that Brian Paddick nails it

www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/22/damian-green-case-former-police-officers-public-interest-brian-paddick
 Another One Bites the Dust - Ambo
>>the porn in question was apparently quite legal.

I wonder how the line can be drawn between legal and illegal porn. For that matter, what is and what is not porn? The legal All 4 TV show "Naked Attraction" looks like porn to me and I don't like to think that my very young grandchildren can download and watch it.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Dutchie
No big deal he was watching a bit of porn.He looks the kind who needs it,maybe he didn't want his wife to know.Damian what a name to have.>:)

He be a consultant soon following Cameron.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
How much longer can Amber Rudd survive?

www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/apr/27/amber-rudd-was-told-about-migrant-removal-targets-leak-reveals
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - R.P.
She's either lied or was ignorant of what was going on. Either option shows her the door really.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Lygonos
This the lass?

www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/96253/1524742876/amberruddfuddb3.jpg
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
Somehow I missed this whole argument. What actually is the problem?

That they have forced return targets or that she lied about them? I thought people wanted illegal immigrants removed?

I realise that I am missing something.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero

>> I realise that I am missing something.

No, not really, its very simple. A large proportion of the populous want illegal immigrants (well any immigrants really) removed from the country, a position hyped up by the gutter, right wing, and redtop press. So when a government department goes about trying to achieve that by having performance targets, the gutter, right wing, and redtop press then go into overdrive about the inhuman unfairness of it all. Only this is also echoed by the left wing press because its a right wing government.

All perfectly logical. I think
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
Ah, so this is like a couple of years ago when the cry to export illegal immigrants was suspended long enough for a petition to prevent the removal of any illegal immigrants who had auditioned on X- Factor?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
Exactly
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> Ah, so this is like a couple of years ago when the cry to export
>> illegal immigrants was suspended long enough for a petition to prevent the removal of any
>> illegal immigrants who had auditioned on X- Factor?

Except that people treated as illegal immigrants were people here legally for 40+ years but who could not prove it and no more thought they'd need to than you or I do.

You know how it is when targets are set (or are believed to be set) - what gets counted gets done and low hanging fruit get picked first.

Rudd's offences are two fold:

Firstly a Guardian Reporter, Amelia Gentleman, has been publicising cases of people who came from Caribbean legally before restrictions. Because they'd never thought they'd need to, never had passports etc to prove their status. No proof of right to work/reside = loss of job and access to healthcare and benefits. Home Office response until last week was standard text about govt's aspiration to remove 'illegals' and need to take (unaffordable) legal advice etc.

Secondly Rudd, when asked about targets, denied their existence. Shown that was wrong she then tried to say they were only there because managers (by implication unofficially) set them for purpose of performance management. Now it seems there were formal targets and she knew of them.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - BiggerBadderDave
Thirdly, Rudd has oddly large hands for a woman.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - tyrednemotional
>>.... Secondly Rudd, when asked about targets, denied their existence. Shown that was wrong she then
>> tried to say they were only there because managers (by implication unofficially) set them for
>> purpose of performance management. Now it seems there were formal targets and she knew of
>> them.
>>
.....going back to the question raised in the thread title, this latter (being "economique avec la vérité") does, IMO, make her considerably more vulnerable.

The Government could better stomach her falling on her sword for this, than for the wider implications of the Windrush and immigration policy disaster, much of which maps directly back to the PM (when Home Secretary).

 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
The system works like this. Questions get asked of a minister, Minister is reliant on the civil service to provide answer, especially on historical items prior to term of minister.

CS provided wrong answers to Minister, they are to blame.
Last edited by: Zero on Fri 27 Apr 18 at 21:18
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - tyrednemotional
...until, with the aid of a leak or whistleblower, plausible deniability turns into implausible deniability......
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
Did she read everything that comes through the department?


No, not possible


Did she ask her department about targets when asked?

Yes


Did they supply all the correct and relevant answers when first asked? days ago?

clearly not,
Last edited by: Zero on Fri 27 Apr 18 at 22:12
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> Did she ask her department about targets when asked?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>
>> Did they supply all the correct and relevant answers when first asked? days ago?
>>
>> clearly not,

Or they told her but she's an arrogant know it all and thought she could cope.....
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> CS provided wrong answers to Minister, they are to blame.

CS will provide her with a comprehensive brief, list of anticipated questions with lines to take and perhaps opportunity to rehearse.

If she ignores brief, goes off piste and/or chooses to 'wing' it guessing stuff instead of saying she'll get back then she is to blame.

I know this happens.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Fri 27 Apr 18 at 22:11
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
She is at the very least careless.

Were I in her position then irrespective of any scandal I would have asked my staff what actions were being taken just in case I was asked.

If I was then asked I would make sure I was updated.

She would appear to be a liar, irresponsible or incompetent. Or "politician" for short.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Robin O'Reliant
>>
>>
>> She would appear to be a liar, irresponsible or incompetent. Or "politician" for short.
>>

Or perhaps just a normal human being like the rest of us.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
>> She would appear to be a liar, irresponsible or incompetent. Or "politician" for short.

>Or perhaps just a normal human being like the rest of us.


Speak for yourself.

In any case, she is a human being who wants to be a politician and is prepared to do what it takes to be one.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - tyrednemotional
...as the saying goes, two things that need changing often are nappies and politicians, and both for exactly the same reason.......

;-)
Last edited by: tyrednemotional on Sat 28 Apr 18 at 17:43
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
The difference between a politician and a trampoline?

You should always take your boots off before jumping on a trampoline.


More seriously though, we get the politicians we deserve. They do what they think will get them elected, not what would be right. And mostly they get elected, so I guess they judge us well.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
The electorate are very poor at electing the right person for the right reasons.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - CGNorwich
How would you ascertain who is the right person then?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
>> How would you ascertain who is the right person then?

No-one who competes for the role for sure. The last people you want to elect are those who desire to be elected.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - CGNorwich
So how would you choose someone who does not want to be elected and perhaps more importantly how could you get them to do a job in which they have no interest?

Would you choose a CEO, a doctor, accountant or plumber on the same basis? I.e someone who had no interest in the job on offer.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
>>So how would you choose someone who does not want to be elected and perhaps more importantly how could you get them to do a job in which they have no interest?

Think broader. You cannot leave the job just the same and insist that someone who doesn't want to do it take it on and vice versa. You have to make it appeal to different people.

At the moment the incentive to be a politician attracts the people that, for the purpose of this discussion, we consider to be the wrong ones

So what attracts them and how far can we remove those attractions? For example, let us assume it is being on television quiz shows. So we bring in a rule that says politicians may not appear on TV quiz shows.

At the moment the people we consider to the the "right" ones are not attracted. So what can we add to the job to make it attractive to them? For example, perhaps it would be paying less tax on all their earnings. So we bring in an income tax discount for politicians.

Dumb examples I admit, but that is how you would need to do it.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - CGNorwich
OK but by definition once you make the job attractive to another group they become people who want the job of politician and therefore undesirable under the original premise.

The big problem is defining the sort of person you want to be an MP and who does the defining. Do we ask the electorate or does someone do it on their behalf, if so whom?

When you think about it the only practical solution is that anyone may stand for election. Not ideal but the only option really
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Manatee
The right person to be prime minister probably doesn't want the job.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - tyrednemotional
>> The right person to be prime minister probably doesn't want the job.
>>

...you're quite correct......

......I don't.

;-)
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Manatee
Perhaps it should be like jury service.

There might need to be a filter to reject those without the necessary thinking ability.

There must be a better method than democracy despite the fact that, and because, I agree with WSC.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - CGNorwich
If you can describe such a system that is achievable then I would be interested to hear it.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
Perhaps bring back the idea of people's peers? Remember that one, what was it 15 years ago?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Cliff Pope
To be properly random it needs to be hereditary. :)
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
Nah no one would have such a system ;)
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Robin O'Reliant
>> There might need to be a filter to reject those without the necessary thinking ability.

If you listen to former politicians when they are interviewed most come across as intelligent and highly aware people who are more than capable of doing very difficult jobs. When in office they can appear exactly the opposite because they are rarely allowed to say and do what they think is right. They are constrained by the party machine and expected to be part of a united front, supporting policies they often don't agree with and may even think are plain wrong. They could speak out of course, but that means sacked from whatever post they hold and possibly deselected before the next election, so any backroom influence they have to try and change policy will go too. Plus of course their income. And any party which is riddled with dissenting voices on their own front benches will not be elected by us anyway as they will be torn apart by the press and the opposition.

Brexit is a fine example. Jeremy Corbyn has been a life long anti EU advocate, but now he is trapped by office and dare not publicly commit to wanting out because most of his MPs and nearly all who voted for him in the leadership election are pro EU. To publicly voice his own beliefs would be political suicide. Many more examples can be found in both main parties, the PM being a case in point as she voted to remain. The idea that the rest of us or some super band of intelligent people who have never bothered to stand for election would somehow be better is just fantasy thinking.

So unless someone comes up with a better system of government we are stuck with what we've got, and it would make no difference if Car4play or any other group was elected to office, we'd all be exactly the same.
Last edited by: VxFan on Mon 30 Apr 18 at 01:38
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2018/apr/29/nicola-jennings-on-the-leaked-memo-about-deportation-targets-cartoon
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bobby
She's gone
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - tyrednemotional
...bin-bagged....
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Timeonmyhands
>> How much longer can Amber Rudd survive?
She's gone.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - smokie
Couldn't believe what I read earlier, which was that one of the loudest voices calling for her to resign was Diana Abbott. You couldn't madly it up sometimes.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - R.P.
May is Rudderless now
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - rtj70
I think it's good timing for an election with final Brexit negotiations still on going. :-(
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - smokie
I'd think it's just about the worst time for an election if we want BREXIT to go through.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
Agreed an election now would be the last thing we need.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> I'd think it's just about the worst time for an election if we want BREXIT
>> to go through.

If we want the current uncertainty resolved and the best outcome I think that must be right.

The threat to May is as much from the 'ultras' in her own party opposed to a customs union as from her own role in 'Windrushgate'.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> Couldn't believe what I read earlier, which was that one of the loudest voices calling
>> for her to resign was Diana Abbott. You couldn't madly it up sometimes.

Diane Abbott is the Shadow Home Secretary. If she wasn't pursuing this issue vigorously you'd quite rightly be saying she was derelict.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
> Diane Abbott is the Shadow Home Secretary. If she wasn't pursuing this issue vigorously you'd
>> quite rightly be saying she was derelict.
>>

I think he's trying to say she's incompetent, she's perhaps not someone who should be throwing stones.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> I think he's trying to say she's incompetent, she's perhaps not someone who should be
>> throwing stones.

I'm no fan off Ms Abbott and, albeit she was ill at time, she made a horlicks of her role in last year's GE.

On this matter though, pursuing a minister who'd put herself into an untenable position, I think she's looked pretty much on the button.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
> On this matter though, pursuing a minister who'd put herself into an untenable position, I
>> think she's looked pretty much on the button.
>>

I suppose what they say about a stopped clock is true ;-)
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
She's Gone. Lets put Boris in her place.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Cliff Pope

>> Diane Abbott is the Shadow Home Secretary.

I knew she was the shadow something - of her former self perhaps?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Timeonmyhands
This government reminds me of the John Major era, so if history repeats itself we could have three terms of Jeremy Corbyn.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - commerdriver
>> This government reminds me of the John Major era, so if history repeats itself we
>> could have three terms of Jeremy Corbyn.
>>
The difference is that Tony Blair, like him or not, was a competent politician surrounded by a small tight team with a competent chancellor and a very capable organisation including Alistair Campbell.
Jeremy has Diane Abbot
Among front line politicians of all parties I can think of about 3 that might qualify as competent.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
Government at least seems to be doing right thing for Windrush folks.

But there's now another cohort of 'hostile environment' victims emerging; skilled migrants from the Indian Sub-Continent. Seems that if you or your accountant make minor errors in your tax return or the Home Office don't understand your tax or books your cards get marked:

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/06/at-least-1000-highly-skilled-migrants-wrongly-face-deportation-experts-reveal
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Duncan
>> Government at least seems to be doing right thing for Windrush folks.

I fail to see why it is unreasonable to expect someone who chooses to move to another country to take steps to regularise their legal status in that country.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> I fail to see why it is unreasonable to expect someone who chooses to move
>> to another country to take steps to regularise their legal status in that country.

The people we're referring to as Windrush Generation arrived before 1973 and were mostly minors travelling on their parents' passports. They were educated here, worked here and paid taxes here. They regarded themselves as British.

Fifty years later they're suddenly expected to 'regularise' their position by reference to data they've no hope of producing.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Cliff Pope

>>
>> Fifty years later they're suddenly expected to 'regularise' their position by reference to data they've
>> no hope of producing.
>>

That's the stupidity of the situation. The state already has the proof they have been hounding these people to provide. Income tax, national insurance, council tax, local authority school records.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
>>were mostly minors

Mostly? So are we ok to deport the others?

Look, this country has got its panties in a knot over immigration and constantly spouts about how it wants them removed. And don't give me that old b******* about "we only hate illegal immigration" because that's just s***e. Immigrants are abused in the street, and nobody checks their status first.

But then everybody whines as soon as it happens.

Who should be removed?

All immigrants?
All illegal immigrants?
All illegal immigrants except those who appear on X-Factor or who have a sob story?
All illegal immigrants except those that have paid taxes and attended school here?
etc. etc.

For me, so that it is quite clear, I believe there should be no such thing as restricted migration, anybody should be entitled to live anywhere. There should be just two rules;

1) Break the law and you're out. No exceptions.
2) You are not permitted to gain from any state that you have not contributed to somehow.

We'd do far better to get off this anti immigrant bandwagon and simply address all criminals, idle-wasters and scroungers, whatever their nationality.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
@NoFM2R

I agree with your general approach although 'break the law and your out' will create hard cases. See the skilled migrants I referenced above who made mistakes on their tax returns, have they broken the law? The Home Office seems to think they have but HMRC haven't even charged them interest/penalties.

The reference to Windrush and minors isn't about merit but about documentation. Somebody who arrived aged 5 travelling on their Mother's passport, as was practice at time, has an additional documentation problem compared to an adult with their own passport showing entry stamps.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
Let us say convicted in court of something above a defined threshold. (let's also try to use you're and your correctly, like they did in days of yore).

I have never heard anybody say "illegal immigrants should be removed unless they have a good reason for being illegal". Perhaps that's how it should be, but I haven't heard that sentiment.

But that is a miserable fact of law; it hurts some people unjustly in the course of enforcing society's chosen standards.

If one doesn't like the ramifications, then one shouldn't have the law. Or at least, not written that way.

You can't have the law and enforce it selectively, however good your motivation, because that way there be dragons.

Perhaps what the State needs do is assess them under current visa application law - they'd probably all pass anyway.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - sooty123
I have never heard anybody say "illegal immigrants should be removed unless they have a
>> good reason for being illegal". Perhaps that's how it should be, but I haven't heard
>> that sentiment.

isn't that, pretty much, political asylum?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
I said "reason for being illegal", surely political asylum is a reason they would not be illegal?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
>> I said "reason for being illegal", surely political asylum is a reason they would not
>> be illegal?

Entirely depends if their claim (and the subsequent constant appeals) is fatuous or not.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
Then they wouldn't be granted political asylum. Surely you understand my point?
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
>> Then they wouldn't be granted political asylum. Surely you understand my point?

Its a long process. And many in fact most claims are fatuous. It could be said that ANY claim for asylum from anyone who enters the uk from Europe is fatuous. Fraudulent even, so worthy of deportation.

Last edited by: Zero on Wed 9 May 18 at 21:10
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - No FM2R
>> >> Surely you understand my point?

I guess not.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Zero
>> >> >> Surely you understand my point?
>>
>> I guess not.

Maybe it isnt a point.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> Let us say convicted in court of something above a defined threshold. (let's also try
>> to use you're and your correctly, like they did in days of yore).

As I've said before I know the your/you're/yore stuff fine well; my issue is slack typing and non existent proof reading.
 Another About to Bite the Dust? - Bromptonaut
>> Government at least seems to be doing right thing for Windrush folks.

As here:

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/10/its-destroyed-my-life-windrush-victim-recognised-as-legal-citizen-after-13-years

How many more Hubert Howards are there out there?
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
Is Esther McVey next to walk the plank? Like Rudd she appears to either a liar or incompetent.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/05/esther-mcvey-refuses-to-widen-apology-over-claim-she-misled-mps

The open letter from the head of National Audit Office is surely without precedent both in fact that it was sent and the tone and content:

www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/04/amyas-morse-auditor-general-universal-credit-letter-esther-mcvey
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
I can't believe that someone making a statement like that is a liar...so only leaves one option
 Another One Bites the Dust - Zero
Politicians are schooled in, and spend most of their career lying to the people who voted them in, why the hell do they get upset when they lie to one another?
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
Speculation today that McVey might be about to go.

Issue though his Brexit and not the pack of lies about Universal Credit she was telling in radio interviews yesterday.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
Too much brexit or not enough?

I only saw the bit about her saying there will be losers in this benefit shake up.
Last edited by: sooty123 on Fri 12 Oct 18 at 10:51
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Too much brexit or not enough?

Not enough; refused to back Chequers. Rumour is that she, Andrea Leadsom and Penny Mordaunt are thinking of jumping.

>> I only saw the bit about her saying there will be losers in this benefit
>> shake up.

Getting that admission was like pulling teeth. The bit that got me was the constant repetition about some of reductions being due to benefits being replaced by wages. That may be true, some people in work are better off on UC. Others, including those currently getting Child Credit, are losers. The straw that broke Iain Duncan Smith's back was Osborne cutting some of the incentives that ensured work always paid.

A big loser cohort are those living alone, getting PIP for daily living (ie have substantial care needs) and for whom nobody gets Carer's Allowance. They currently get a 'Severe Disability Premium worth over £60 a week. They will be hundreds of pounds a month worse off on transfer to new regime as there's no equivalent in UC. She's promised, after being dragged through the courts, some transitional protection. Her words to the House making that promise carried the clear implication they would be no worse off. When the regulations were published it became apparent that a lot of them would be.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Fri 12 Oct 18 at 11:28
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
Surely it's game over for Karen Bradley?

The idea that every killing by the security forces in NI were not crimes and were 'dignified' and 'orderly' shows a utter ignorance (or denial) of fact. Never mind that she should be aware of how her comments will be seen by the Nationalist community.

Her position is surely untenable.

Amber Rudd's use of 'coloured' OTOH was a slip, she's apologised and that should be end of matter.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Fri 8 Mar 19 at 07:43
 Another Must Bite the Dust - No FM2R
Her position is probably untenable because of the baying for blood going on.

But for goodness sakes, the age of taking offence is getting ridiculous.

Of course her comment was wrong, but it was fairly clear what she meant. She spoke without thinking and then continued to dig herself a hole. But now the emotive comments are pouring out from those who have suddenly seen an opportunity to be traumatised.


The media will never let it go; 10 years from now any story involving her will be reported as "Karen Bradley, who once said...."

It's all too ridiculous for words.

As for the Amber Rudd comment, worse. Way to pick out one word and ignore the message. How delicate can people be that they can ignore someone supportive of their position and the challenges they face and pick on one word.

How much longer will this sensitivity and offence taking be tolerated?
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> But for goodness sakes, the age of taking offence is getting ridiculous.

The generality of that and where line is drawn is an interesting debate. Offence at Amber Rudd's 'miss-speak' is a case in point.

Although the armed conflict has stopped The Troubles have not gone away; there are still two camps each isolated from the other. I was on a course on Tuesday about Universal Credit. The trainer regularly visits NI as part of his work and was describing how streets still have to be closed at night and there are many places that are 'no go' areas for one side or the other.

Bloody Sunday and several other events as well as security force collaboration with Loyalist Paramilitaries are still real sores. It took 40 years for the UK government to admit the entirety of what happened on 30th January 1972.

OK, it was presumably a case of 'down the hole and still digging' but that won't wash with Nationalists who will see it as confirmation of the real views of the British government.

Baroness O'Loan is hardly part of the professionally offended cohort; her words ring true.
Last edited by: VxFan on Sat 9 Mar 19 at 20:43
 Another Must Bite the Dust - No FM2R
But on your main point, the sensitivity is ridiculous.

Just how delicate must these people be if they are genuinely offended by such comments? But the truth is that they are not. They are virtue signallers and people seeking excuses for outrage.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> But on your main point, the sensitivity is ridiculous.

I think your failing to understand the nature of NI politics and the grip perceived historic wrongs or wins have on both sides. The Loyalists dress up in bowler hats and sashes every July to commemorate the 329 year old 'victory' which was in a way where it all started.

Or to quote Flanders and Swan:

They blow up policemen, or so I have heard
And blame it on Cromwell and William the Third
 Another Must Bite the Dust - No FM2R
Failing to understand nothing. I have lived in both North and South.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> Failing to understand nothing. I have lived in both North and South.

OK, another of those instances where you and I see things through different prisms.

That's life. No sweat.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - No FM2R
Agreed.

But these people need to move on. Living in the South is a pretty pleasant experience. But the bitter sensitivity of life in the North is ridiculous and full of people who desperately seek offence.as some kind of self justification.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - sooty123
Although the armed conflict has stopped The Troubles have not gone away; there are still
>> two camps each isolated from the other. I was on a course on Tuesday about
>> Universal Credit. The trainer regularly visits NI as part of his work and was describing
>> how streets still have to be closed at night and there are many places that
>> are 'no go' areas for one side or the other.

I was watching a show on BBC about NI, the reporter said there were more miles of walls in Belfast than berlin during the cold war. I don't know if it's true i can well believe it.

I sometimes wonder if we could drop certain parts of NI in the middle east. I think some of them would be more at home, it's less than an hours flight but still a very different place from the rest of the uk. May as well be on another planet at times.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Roger.
No wonder there is a recruitment crisis in the Armed Forces.
As far as offence taking is concerned, it will get worse until no one can express an opinion.
Was Orwell ever so right?
The Thought Police really are here.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Lemma
I don't think Karen Bradley should be sacked for her latest comment. However I do think she should be sacked, primarily because she is stupid and ignorant. When she was appointed to her current post she didn't even know the difference between unionists and nationalists - and she's the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland?? She went to one of the best universities in thew world but apparently remained woefully ignorant of even the most basic characteristics of a part of the United Kingdom for which she is an elected representative.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> I don't think Karen Bradley should be sacked for her latest comment.

I think the latest comment comes under same heading as first. Even if it was a miss-speak it's so serious and so undermining of her credibility with the Nationalist community that she should go.

 Another Must Bite the Dust - Duncan
The sooner Northern Ireland is re-united with the South the better.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - sooty123
>> The sooner Northern Ireland is re-united with the South the better.

Good luck with that.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Roger.
>> The sooner Northern Ireland is re-united with the South the better.
>>
....or vice versa? ;-)
 Another Must Bite the Dust - sooty123
She's quite possibly speaking to the unionist side and many in her own party, especially with several ex-service personnel waiting on a decision to see if they'll be prosecuted in an atmosphere that many feel is one sided.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> She's quite possibly speaking to the unionist side and many in her own party

That would be another tick in the stupid box.........
 Another Must Bite the Dust - sooty123
>> >> She's quite possibly speaking to the unionist side and many in her own party
>>
>> That would be another tick in the stupid box.........

She's probably a way to go before she can say one thing and mean something else entirely.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Lygonos
Time for Bradley to return NI to direct rule.

2 years with no functioning assembly and civil servants ticking over the nation.

Imagine a first world nation incapable of doing anything for 2 years because of a political deadlock?

Hahahahahahaha.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Zero
>> Time for Bradley to return NI to direct rule.
>>
>> 2 years with no functioning assembly and civil servants ticking over the nation.

Just goes to show that we don't actually need politicians
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> She's probably a way to go before she can say one thing and mean something
>> else entirely.

It's a technique most Cabinet Ministers pick up pretty quickly - another tick in the stupid box :-).
 Another Must Bite the Dust - sooty123
It's a technique most Cabinet Ministers pick up pretty quickly - another tick in the
>> stupid box :-).
>>

And some need a bit of OJT.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - No FM2R
The trouble is, OJT for a politician in the UK at this time doesn't teach them anything we really want them to know.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Roger.
Having spent two periods of three weeks (2017 and 2106, for Xmas ) not far from Belfast, I felt vaguely uncomfortable when venturing out, despite being treated with the utmost civility by people I met.
Armed guards on the base gate, and the threat level set at "high" was unsettling.
 Another Must Bite the Dust - Zero
I cam assure you, your Brexit is not going to improve that one jot.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
Our very own MP, Chris Heaton-Harris has resigned as junior Brexit Minister over delay to Brexit. Wants to spend more time on his constituents.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
The defence secretary has been fired over the huawai leak.
 Another One Bites the Dust - R.P.
Leaked in the national interest I wonder ? May's off her rocker.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
Maybe it or isn't, but either way if he felt that strong he should have resigned.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
Absolutely. He took the job, and if he feels he can no longer do the job, then he should leave it. If he really feels the information should be public, then he should at least share it openly.

To try to leak it and to do so secretly is appalling.

Assume he did it, of course. He is denying it and May is not sharing the "compelling evidence".

That woman is becoming a concern. The sooner she is gone the better.

 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
> Assume he did it, of course. He is denying it and May is not sharing
>> the "compelling evidence".
>>

It would seem he very much denies it, strenuously so. The reason he refused to resign was he believes none of his advisors and he believes its a result of a previous fall out with mark sedwell.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> It would seem he very much denies it, strenuously so. The reason he refused to
>> resign was he believes none of his advisors and he believes its a result of
>> a previous fall out with mark sedwell.

In words that chime with my Cultural Reference thread...

Well he would say that, wouldn't he?
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
>> Well he would say that, wouldn't he?
>>

It’s a funny old world when you have to decide whether it’s the Prime Minister or the Defence Secretary who is lying.

Last edited by: CGNorwich on Wed 1 May 19 at 20:11
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
>> >> It would seem he very much denies it, strenuously so.
>>
>> In words that chime with my Cultural Reference thread...
>>
>> Well he would say that, wouldn't he?
>>

Inevitably so.

If he says "I did it" then 100% of people believe he did it.
Newspapers can talk about it freely.

If he says "I didn't do it" then however many people believe he did it, it won't be 100%.
Newspapers who come out and say he did it run the risk of being sued so will mention it less or at least be careful.

Where on Earth would be the logic in admitting it in a witch-hunting environment..
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich

>>
>> Where on Earth would be the logic in admitting it in a witch-hunting environment..
>>
>>
I suppose we could be looking for honesty and integrity but I suppose that would be silly.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
Naive, certainly.

All that happens if a politician is honest is that the media can attack with impunity.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
>> Where on Earth would be the logic in admitting it in a witch-hunting environment..
>>

Possibly but quite often members of cabinet when backed into a corner resign. Pretty rare to be sacked.
Last edited by: VxFan on Thu 2 May 19 at 02:03
 Another One Bites the Dust - Kevin
>Possibly but quite often members of cabinet when backed into a corner resign. Pretty rare to be sacked.

He's not backing down. In his reply to No. !0's statement he says that he refused the offer to resign because that would have been to accept that I, my civil servants, my military advisers or my staff were responsible: this was not the case.

Ball now firmly in May's court and it's her who is in a corner because she won't have the bottle to back up her actions with a prosecution.

Chinese equipment and components are definitely a security risk but even US suppliers use Chinese fabbed chips.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
>>Ball now firmly in May's court and it's her who is in a corner because she won't have the bottle to back up her actions with a prosecution.

I agree. She will back down.

At best I would guess she has some he said / she said statements, I'd be almost positive she has no "overwhelming evidence". Or any "evidence" at all, beyond reports and accusations..

There#ll be some kind of compensation, financial or otherwise, coming down the line.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
>> In words that chime with my Cultural Reference thread...
>>
>> Well he would say that, wouldn't he?
>>


In all honesty, in the political atmosphere now god knows.
 Another One Bites the Dust - smokie
Been out this evening but I thought I read that there was other stuff under his purview that TM wasn't happy with, that came out in the inquiry.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
>> Been out this evening but I thought I read that there was other stuff under
>> his purview that TM wasn't happy with, that came out in the inquiry.
>>

Did it say what other stuff?
 Another One Bites the Dust - smokie
Not as far as I recall, I only read it quickly and I can't find the Beeb article I thought I saw it in(so maybe they were just making it up, or maybe I am!)

I see TMs letter said

"I am therefore concerned by the manner in which you have engaged with this investigation.

"It has been conducted fairly, with the full co-operation of other NSC attendees.

"They have all answered questions, engaged properly, provided as much information as possible to assist with the investigation, and encouraged their staff to do the same. Your conduct has not been of the same standard as others."

So it sounds like he may not have been as cooperative as he could have been. He apparently also did meet someone from the Telegraph, which is where the leak occurred. Sounds entirely feasible that someone has put one and one equal something other than two!
 Another One Bites the Dust - bathtub tom
I noticed he said "I swear on my children's lives". Whenever I've heard someone say that (usually the lower educated classes) they always turn out to be lying.
 Another One Bites the Dust - CGNorwich
The "lower educated classes" ?

Ah I see what you mean. State school and non Oxbridge university. Some sort of bounder that has infiltrated the establishment. Comes from one of those Northern places where they all speak funny. Probably uses fish knives.

 Another One Bites the Dust - henry k
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48128188
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
Yes those Cambridge types always trustworthy with the nation's secrets.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Duncan
>> The "lower educated classes" ?
>>
>> Ah I see what you mean. State school and non Oxbridge university. Some sort of
>> bounder that has infiltrated the establishment. Comes from one of those Northern places where they
>> all speak funny. Probably uses fish knives.

And holds his cutlery like a pen.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
>>I noticed he said "I swear on my children's lives".

Possibility 1) He's a plank and hasn't thought it through if he's proven to be guilty
Possibility 2) He's innocent. (at least of leaking this information).

I think I tend towards 2).

I also notice that despite what the media say, he was NOT sacked for leaking information. He was let go because he had "lost the Primeminister's confidence".

If ever there was an indication that the "overwhelming evidence" doesn't exist, that would be it.

Last edited by: No FM2R on Thu 2 May 19 at 18:19
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
I also now read that she now says that she considers the matter closed and that there is no need to refer it to the Police.

I expect she is hoping that it does not get referred because she is likely to come out of any investigation looking very foolish.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Kevin
>I also now read that she now says that she considers the matter closed and that there is no need to
>refer it to the Police.

I don't think this is going to go away as easily as she hopes if Williamson keeps insisting it wasn't him. She's in a hole and still digging furiously.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Bromptonaut
>> I noticed he said "I swear on my children's lives". Whenever I've heard someone say
>> that (usually the lower educated classes) they always turn out to be lying.

Regular cliche on police/law tv series. Heard it once or twice in my previous career, usually made me think 'you're probably not being honest'.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
I've not met him however those that have, outside of tv interviews, say he does speak in a plain straight forward way. Some might well describe it as an enthusiastic school boy manner.
I wouldn't read too much into his choice of words.
Last edited by: sooty123 on Thu 2 May 19 at 18:22
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
A score being settled, I expect.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gavin-williamson-theresa-may-defence-spending-row-bring-down-government-20bn-a8413916.html
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
That's been going on for some time, late last year I think. From what I heard he managed to get the defence review removed from a wider security review as he felt if it were left in it would be little more than a hatchet job on the MoD's budget. He succeeded but made some enemies in doing so.

If this is a revenge job (and I don't know if it is ) they'd have better got their story straight.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
I should think it was more taking advantage of an opportunity than a preconceived revenge job.

>>they'd have better got their story straight.

Theresa May? Not a chance.
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
>> I should think it was more taking advantage of an opportunity than a preconceived revenge
>> job.

Agreed.

>
>> >>they'd have better got their story straight.
>>
>> Theresa May? Not a chance.
>>

No I was thinking of others.
 Another One Bites the Dust - No FM2R
If it wasn't Williamson then it puts a certain reporter in an interesting position.

Because if he now comes out and says it wasn't Williamson and was nothing to do with Williamson that'd make rather a good story, albeit perhaps risky to whoever actually did it.

If I was TM, I'd probably be hoping against hope that it was Williamson, because she could be right in the cack if not and it comes out. Her careful phrasing and use of "lost confidence" rather than "leaking b******" probably will not protect her.
 Another One Bites the Dust - Zero
Brush it under the carpet time

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48160004

Not a criminal matter say police
 Another One Bites the Dust - sooty123
How awfully convenient.
 Andrea Leadsom - Bromptonaut
Resigns as Leader of House over approach to Brexit.

Mrs B and I were struggling to understand a tweet from Jess Phillips apparently approving Loathsome until we saw headlines and got context.
 Welsh Secretary Resigns - Bromptonaut
Welsh Secretary resigns:

www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/06/alun-cairns-welsh-secretary-resigns-from-cabinet-over-trial-allegations

Issue appears to be lack of accuracy/frankness in statements made about a prospective candidate in forthcoming elections for Sennedd.
 Welsh Secretary Resigns - R.P.
He's regarded as a brown nosing grovelling little s*** by many in Wales. Now also a proven liar.
 Welsh Secretary Resigns - No FM2R
>> He's regarded as a brown nosing grovelling little s*** by many in Wales. Now also
>> a proven liar.


I think you'll find that "politician" is shorter to type.
 Welsh Secretary Resigns - Bromptonaut
>> He's regarded as a brown nosing grovelling little s*** by many in Wales. Now also
>> a proven liar.

Vox pop in his constituency doesn't augur well for him.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/06/alun-cairnss-constituency-cowbridge-remember-theres-a-victim-at-centre-of-this
 Keith Vaz not standing for re-election - henry k
www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50369905

Labour's Keith Vaz, who was suspended from the Commons after he was found to have "expressed willingness" to purchase cocaine for others, will not be standing for re-election.
Latest Forum Posts