>> Silver haired couples aged 63 and 66 needing help from foodbanks ain't going to look
>> good.....
So I wrote to my MP about this. After fending off an attempt by his 'admin' to refer it to DWP for reply - pointed out I'm a retired Civil Servant and could draft reply for them - I finally get a personal response from him. Basically he simply re-hashes the Written Ministerial Statement, including a reference to a government paper my original letter debunked. Adds something that looks suspiciously like a party issued 'line to take' making a thoroughly disingenuous comparison between rate at which income is withdrawn for earnings in Universal Credit compared with Pension credit and says he hopes I will contact him if he can be of further assistance.
Reply in draft.
Is it tactless to point out to the MP, Chris Heaton-Harris, who was recently made to look a complete ass-hat by a Scottish QC on the DExEU Select Committee, that aspects of the policy I'm questioning might be difficult to justify in the media or to a Select Committee?
Is it reasonable to use the word Schadenfreude when referring to my response if, as I expect it to, this blows up into a media brouhaha in the summer?
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Tue 12 Feb 19 at 22:30
|