In our previous house we had Virgin Media and had Sky Sports plus ESPN. We are soon to move into our new house and VM is an option but I wonder if Sky is a better option for us. This is based on answers to some questions though. VM was very good.
Whilst we had Sky Sports and ESPN, my wife's football team was only shown a few times a year. And likely to be similar I guess for 2010/11. But if we had Sky Sports via Sky:
- Could we see her team via the 'red button' in the evenings when they reshow games? During the day live would be better still
- How good are the bells and whistles with Sky for football along the lines of player cam etc?
- If a game came up we wanted could I get Sky Sports/ESPN for only that month and cancel again? It was an option on VM but I had a good discount so never cancelled because of the discount! I wanted to carry it forward but sold in December and complete next week.
If I go for Sky I might just junk all sports and save £27 per month. I might also miss the ability to record two channels and watch a third mind.
I am not going to get a Sky HD pack because there is little benefit.
|
Sky Sports Question new
Sky Sports Question new