I read the various comments about the supercars in pale blue, a horrendous colour that may look good on a Ka or FIAT 500 but not on anything bigger. I read the inevitable "If I had a Ferrari it would have to be red" and my contrary nature thought "If I had a Ferrari it would be in any colour BUT red". Do you remember the Car mag cover headlined "In the clearing stands a boxer" (that dates it!) with a gorgeous BLUE Ferrari on the cover? And I'm sure other, non red, colours can look equally good.
And then I thought "but do I WANT a Ferrari". And then I realised, I don't. I used to. I have been known to respond to ridiculous requests with "and I want a Ferrari but that's not going to happen either". So why did I and why don't I? Perhaps it's me? Perhaps it's the more constrained road conditions we have today? Perhaps it's the ever rising and therefore less accessible performance of such cars? Perhaps it's because 1960s /70s supercar perfromance can be had from much more civilsed cars and the supercar performance has gone up into the stratosphere? I have no idea. I still want an Aston Martin and yes, that's probably illogical. But an out and out supercar? I don't think so. But don't tempt me!
You can get outrageous performance and good looks from something that doesn't require gymnastics to get into and which doesn't make your eyeballs drop out or break your spine. I'm happy to go "phwoar" at the sight of a supercar. I'm glad they exist. But I've just realised I don't want one. Do you?
JH
|