"You still seem unable to accept that, for the example I gave I was correct. "
Sorry, which bit are you referring to? Remember, I was talking about a PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottle, not a toughened glass champagne bottle (unsqueezable).
If you are talking about the bit where you said compared a slightly emptied champagne bottle with an almost empty bottle, then of course you are correct - but that is a red herring.
How do you view the question that I posted at 11:54?
""If I buy two identical 2 litre PET bottles of Sainsbury's Basic Lemonade, then empty them so that they are both half-full. On one, I allow the bottle to flip out to its original shape and screw the cap on; for the other, I squeeze out the gas to make the volume above the liquid smaller - then I screw the cap on.
Question - in which bottle will the remaining lemonade go flattest first?""
The conversation is about flexible plastic (PET) bottles - NOT thick glass champagne bottles.
One more squeak of this nonsense, and I'll know that it's a wind-up!
|