>> If their decision was upheld, it would mean any PM could pretty much prorogue parliament
>> on a whim in perpetuity.
Spot on. We're in midst of biggest set of constitutional decision making since joining Common Market. Only because Common Market has evolved since 1973 it's much bigger.
Even if government could get/has got away with manipulating prorogation in past to get NHS legislation through or avoid reports on 'cash for questions' that is just 'whataboutery' in current context.
|