What car, Shed estate. 156 Sportwagon?

What car, Shed estate. 156 Sportwagon?

Author
Discussion

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,921 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
I have recently sold my "shed" Saab 9-5 Estate 2.3T SE, the car was fully loaded and a lovely car although its sheer thirst and clumbersome Automatic box made me think I had to move it on. I got £430 for the car on a 99p start ebay auction, by the time I paid the fees I received somewhere around £390, I was truly gutted and one lucky ebayer walked away with a nice car (nice bloke actually).

Anyway, one month later I am missing my "shed estate" and I have resorted to scanning ebay religiously for a bargain car to replace the Saab, I have been watching manual diesel cars closely although there seems to be little available for under £900, most are either dogs, moon mileage or in very poor condition. I then thought I can live with any fuel car (Diesel, Petrol or LPG) as long as the fuel costs are low. I have looked at all the alternatives and it seems bargains (especially diesel) are difficult to find, I have even slipped into the thinking that "if its the same to run as the Saab (20mpg around town) I don't mind as long as it is quick", I am thinking a manual HOT Aero Turbo / T5 V70 etc.

Anyway, my search hasn't turned up much. I have made a few genuine offers but it seems ebayers turn down offers, leave the auction run and then receive the same as my early offer plus 10% on top which they have to pay ebay anyway. My ideal car is an E46 estate with any engine, the ones that sell for under £1k are usually rough and have rust/engine issues and have high mileage (160k+).

So last night I stumble across an Alfa Romeo 156 Sportwagon, I love the look of these and most meet my desired spec (leather, manual, modern looking, lowish miles) however I am worried about the reliability of them. The most widely available car for my budget appears to be the 2.0 Twin Spark (TS), does anyone have any information on the reliability of these cars? The one I have my eye on has 109k on the clock, recent cam belt replacement, lots of history etc. It genuinly seems like a bargain however its 300 miles away and my theory is if it seems to good to be true, it usually is.

Being a former (new) Alfa owner I don't mean to jump on the Alfa "unreliable" bandwagon, however, these 156's have me worried. Can anyone tell me about the engine and other issues to be found in the 156SW? The looks and the interior obliterate everything else at this price level, its the oily/electrical bits I have no faith in frown

Any comments on other engines found in SOTW money SW's would also be appreciated smile

Feel free to make other suggestions, live links always help smile

Requirements:
  • Powerful or Economic
  • Reasonably modern looking (no 850's etc)
  • Manual
  • Leather
  • Estate
  • None moon mileage
  • Good/detailed history
  • Tax & Test preferably
  • Budget around £900, £1k absolute maximum


the stigs dad

378 posts

139 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
St220 estate or accord type r estate

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Fairly reliable - the TS ain't bad, the later JTS more problematic. Cambelts not being done and low oil (do weekly checks!) are the obvious hazards. Selespeeds are problematic, partly inherently and partly due to poor maintenance, so avoid them.

Suspension bits need replacing often. Tyre wear can be bad but alignment obviously helps. Electricals are generally sound but depend on age to an extent - early ones are Magneti Marelli, newer ones are all Bosch. I think this happened around the interior facelift so let us know what age you're looking at. Expect the usual problems like MAF etc, but nothing spectacular. The 156 is pre-CANBUS so reduces potential headaches.

Rust protection is good, except the floor which may not have been properly undersealed, and the roof which isn't galvanised but typically doesn't rust.

Alfa specialists are generally very good - where are you based? So is the owner community (Alfaowner), especially for technical questions.

Edited by trashbat on Tuesday 4th December 09:06

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,921 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
the stigs dad said:
St220 estate or accord type r estate
No chance at my budget.
trashbat said:
Fairly reliable - the TS ain't bad, the later JTS more problematic. Cambelts not being done and low oil (do weekly checks!) are the obvious hazards.

Suspension bits need replacing often. Tyre wear can be bad but alignment obviously helps. Electricals are generally sound but depend on age to an extent - early ones are Magneti Marelli, newer ones are all Bosch. I think this happened around the interior facelift so let us know what age you're looking at. Expect the usual problems like MAF etc, but nothing spectacular. The 156 is pre-CANBUS so reduces potential headaches.

Alfa specialists are generally very good - where are you based? So is the owner community (Alfaowner), especially for technical questions.
Thanks for the detailed response smile

This is the one that has caught my eye: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160914415565?_trksid=p51... I am not sure whether or not this is a facelift car? How do you tell if it is a facelift TS? I have read that the TS is more reliable than the later JTS engine, I have also read it is more "fun" than the JTS although I read this on an Alfa owners site (I tend to take the comments on OC websites with a pinch of salt, the spectacles are usually very big and very pink).

dave_s13

13,815 posts

270 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
If you need an estate for the space then the Alfa will disappoint. The boot space is only marginally more than a normal hatchback.

They have a horrificly smalllarge turning circle
The diesels take an age to warm the interior (10miles plus).
The engine sits so low it scrapes over normal speed bumps
The electrics are tempremental - something will work one minute, not the next
Suspension components are made from cheese
There are no cupholders! - this trivial point is suprisingly annoying

Look nice though.

I would defy anyone to buy a £1k Alfa 156 and not have it go wrong very regularly.

I had a facelifted 156 2.4JTDm manual for a bit - hated it.


Edited by dave_s13 on Tuesday 4th December 09:27

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
Thanks for the detailed response smile

This is the one that has caught my eye: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160914415565?_trksid=p51... I am not sure whether or not this is a facelift car? How do you tell if it is a facelift TS? I have read that the TS is more reliable than the later JTS engine, I have also read it is more "fun" than the JTS although I read this on an Alfa owners site (I tend to take the comments on OC websites with a pinch of salt, the spectacles are usually very big and very pink).
Prevailing AO opinion is generally valid. You can ask on there if anyone knows the car. FYI, JTS is post-2002 so possibly out of budget anyway. I have one.

I just found that car, also here: http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...

It's before any facelift (they did the interior then the exterior). That brings some extra potential failures like something in the rev counter going and causing the rear lights to stay on, which drains the battery, but really this is fairly low worry stuff.

Oh and expect about 28mpg on average. Depends on the type of driving of course.

trashbat

6,006 posts

154 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
dave_s13 said:
If you need an estate for the space then the Alfa will disappoint. The boot space is only marginally more than a normal hatchback.

They have a horrificly small turning circle - large, but true
The diesels take an age to warm the interior (10miles plus). - needs a new thermostat then
The engine sits so low it scrapes over normal speed bumps - the 2.4 has a low sump
The electrics are tempremental - something will work one minute, not the next - nothing wrong with mine
Suspension components are made from cheese - yep
There are no cupholders! - this trivial point is suprisingly annoying - somehow I get by

Look nice though.

I would defy anyone to buy a £1k Alfa 156 and not have it go wrong very regularly.

Things that went wrong on my £2k-ish car this year: lightbulbs x3, climate control dial, a rattle inside the OSR door

I had a facelifted 156 2.4JTDm manual for a bit - hated it.

SuperchargedVR6

3,138 posts

221 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
The most widely available car for my budget appears to be the 2.0 Twin Spark (TS), does anyone have any information on the reliability of these cars? The one I have my eye on has 109k on the clock, recent cam belt replacement, lots of history etc.
It's 11K off a spark plug change @ £160 plus fitting. Although seeing the state of mine at each 60K interval, I'd do them sooner personally. The smaller plugs had no electrode at all and the bigger ones had gaps you could drive a bus through.

Tuvra said:
Being a former (new) Alfa owner I don't mean to jump on the Alfa "unreliable" bandwagon, however, these 156's have me worried. Can anyone tell me about the engine and other issues to be found in the 156SW? The looks and the interior obliterate everything else at this price level, its the oily/electrical bits I have no faith in frown
The engine is fine. It's a FIAT based 2.0 with balancer shafts, so it's nice and smooth compared to a lot of other 2.0s from that era. No significant mechanical weaknesses. The engine management is Bosch, rather than the Italian Magnetti Marelli, so it's reliable. Mine's done 125k with absolutely no break downs.
It pulls well low down and has a good top end too. The 147 with this engine is actually quite a rapid car.

Now the part that is Italian is the unreliable bit... the interior wiring and electrics!
There's an ECU called the "Body Control ECU", which is essentially the same thing as BMW's 'Check' system. It also controls other functions. The most common fault is the offside rear sidelight staying on when the car is off. It's very dim and only noticable at night (if you look for it) but it drains the battery in a few days. The Alfa fix is to replace the Body Control computer (not cheap), but my fix was to cut the sidelight feed wire and run a wire over from the nearside lamp holder. Fixed. You still get the "sidelight bulb" ping and message on the dash, but you learn to ignore it.

Other than that, it's a good car. Any niggles are discussed in detail on the Alfa forums and once the common bugs have been found and fixed, it's as reliable as anything else.

The car has excellent corrosion protection too.

Tuvra said:
  • Powerful or Economic
Mine averages 26mpg and it drinks oil. There's even a warning sticker on the windscreen that it's a "performance engine" and uses oil, and it does! It needs 10W/60 oil to keep the consumption reasonable.

Oh and the thermostat sticking open is common on this engine too, but it's £40 and very easy to change.

Edited by SuperchargedVR6 on Tuesday 4th December 09:30

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,921 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Thanks guys. If I could get a good reliable Alfa Romeo 156SW with any engine, I could cope with 28pg.

The trouble with the Saab was it was a boring drive and was very hard to "push on" unless you was on a motorway, booting the car and trying to get the gearbox into the right gear was like asking a homeless person living in Central London how much council tax was South Wales i.e. after some time, it would stutter a bit, make some noise and then give you an answer that you think is right, although your not even sure yourself.

As far as the boot goes, its only to take a dog cage really, I can put the seats down to carry the small amounts of stock that I carry smile

bakerstreet

4,767 posts

166 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
dave_s13 said:
If you need an estate for the space then the Alfa will disappoint. The boot space is only marginally more than a normal hatchback.

They have a horrificly small turning circle
The diesels take an age to warm the interior (10miles plus).
The engine sits so low it scrapes over normal speed bumps
The electrics are tempremental - something will work one minute, not the next
Suspension components are made from cheese
There are no cupholders! - this trivial point is suprisingly annoying

Look nice though.

I would defy anyone to buy a £1k Alfa 156 and not have it go wrong very regularly.

I had a facelifted 156 2.4JTDm manual for a bit - hated it.

The 10 mile warm up thing would be exactly the same as my current Saab and the two Golfs I had before. I wouldn't say its a big problem.

What does the OP consider to be 'moon and back' mileage? This is PH world where some still think cars are knackered by 100k!

Edited by bakerstreet on Tuesday 4th December 09:49

eltax91

9,897 posts

207 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Arn't e36 (as apose to e46) tourings plentiful under this budget? Seem a little unloved to me.

dave_s13

13,815 posts

270 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
....As far as the boot goes, its only to take a dog cage really, I can put the seats down to carry the small amounts of stock that I carry smile
Depends on the size of your dog, there really isn't much room in the back and the boot has a large lip for pooch to leap over (and scratch the paint thereof).

Re saabs - I also had a 95 Aero Manual - much more sensible car but you really can't throw them about, the front end just washes out on you. Gearbox is very notchy too, not nice to use in anger. Mine did 23mpg average and needed 99RON+ for the engine to give full power. Epic in a srtaight line though.

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,921 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
eltax91 said:
Arn't e36 (as apose to e46) tourings plentiful under this budget? Seem a little unloved to me.
I could live with an E36, trouble is I am a fussy beggar and the car has to catch my eye. One ticked all the boxes and was literally just down the road, unfortunatley it was dark green with tan leather. This is my "shed" car so I want it as neutral as anything so ideally silver with black leather and some nice (biggish) alloys. Nice & presentable to look at but not nice enough to draw any form of attention.

The Dogs involved are a French Bulldog and a Pug, so not too big smile

RP1

252 posts

151 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
156's are as reliable as anything else out there IF they have been looked after properly. Sadly looking after cars properly (as oppose to just getting a stamp in the book evey time its due) seems to be a dying trend!

Echo above with suspension being made of cheese though! Suspension components need to be treated as a consumable just as brake pads etc.

If you get one the 2.0 is the best bet for budget motoring, but bear in mind its not a car you can service once a year and forget about the rest of the time. They need to be loved!!

I bought a 156 V6 for £600 last year and it had been looked after properly by an enthusiast. I never had any trouble with it. But i was very lucky!

My shout for a cheap car with lots of space and kit would be a Saab 9000, that hatch is cavernous and easily as commodious as a medium to large estate car (fitted my two dogs in very comfortably). They are seriously comfortable, well kitted out and nice to drive. Also unlike the 9-5 they are actually verty easy to work on as you can access most of the engine bits very easily. Although they are getting on a bit now they don't feel particulalrly dated and IMO don't look it either, though they do seem to be getting more difficult to come by now. Manual turbo models are all either quick or very cheaply and easily tuned (quick ECU map circa £80) and economical (24ish mpg town and 33ish on a run)

I was looking for another just recently with a budget of £650ish but after a month couldn't find any near enough or any good, ended up with a 9-5 aero estate in manual flavour for £750. Currently doing 23mpg on a stop start commute of 4 miles each way. not too bad.

Edited by RP1 on Tuesday 4th December 10:23


Edited by RP1 on Tuesday 4th December 10:24

Tuvra

Original Poster:

7,921 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Ten Four said:
I never thought I could live with an Impreza, its just the image, the older cars are a definite no, no. The newer cars featured are nice enough though, especially the blue car if it didn't have the carbon bonnet. Am I right in suspecting this will go for much more than £1k? Seems cheap?

Also, I can't see my girlfriend being happy to drive an Impreza, she hates the image more than me.

HustleRussell

24,750 posts

161 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
I've got an E34 BMW touring... It's a fair bit older than some of the other suggestions but the mecahnicals are pretty bullet proof. You have to watch for rust and at this age you can expect to have to do some suspension work and preventative maintenance, but I've got myself into a trustworthy usable one for much less than £1k.
The Mondeo is under-appreciated, massive and great value for money.

TAHodgson

875 posts

172 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
dave_s13 said:
If you need an estate for the space then the Alfa will disappoint. The boot space is only marginally more than a normal hatchback.


I would defy anyone to buy a £1k Alfa 156 and not have it go wrong very regularly.


Edited by dave_s13 on Tuesday 4th December 09:27
I paid £300 for my 2002 1.6, granted the variator was dead, but i bought it knowingly. £500 spent at a specialist friend, variator, belt etc. Ran it for three years and the only thing that I had to do, bar routine oil/filter changes etc was get a new drivers' window switch. Absolutely loved that car!

Ten Four

292 posts

152 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
I never thought I could live with an Impreza, its just the image, the older cars are a definite no, no. The newer cars featured are nice enough though, especially the blue car if it didn't have the carbon bonnet. Am I right in suspecting this will go for much more than £1k? Seems cheap?

Also, I can't see my girlfriend being happy to drive an Impreza, she hates the image more than me.
I guess? Lots of old blokes drive them around here. That carbon bonnet would surely be worth 200-350 sold separately so there's some money back.. I just looked on eBay for 5mins to come up with those. There's a few buy it now ones ~1500 so I'd say not too far off.. Subaru reliability for the win.. I know of many over 150k. Mate just bought a 2006 one with 125k and it drives like brand new.

Mr E

21,709 posts

260 months

Tuesday 4th December 2012
quotequote all
We went from a 156 SW to a 9-5 (Aero).

The 9-5 is hugely bigger than the alfa was. It's also considerably more rapid and drinks less fuel.

dave_s13 said:
If you need an estate for the space then the Alfa will disappoint. The boot space is only marginally more than a normal hatchback.
Indeed. They're not big. I considered it more of a "5 door coupe".

dave_s13 said:
They have a horrificly smalllarge turning circle
Yah, and I think the V6 is even worse. It wasn't usually a problem though.

dave_s13 said:
The engine sits so low it scrapes over normal speed bumps
I scraped the undertray all the time. I never caught the sump on anything.

dave_s13 said:
The electrics are tempremental - something will work one minute, not the next
5 years. All the electrics worked all of the time with the exception of the rear wiper (common fault).

dave_s13 said:
Suspension components are made from cheese
Yup.

dave_s13 said:
There are no cupholders! - this trivial point is suprisingly annoying
Never bothered me, but it may annoy some people.


dave_s13 said:
I would defy anyone to buy a £1k Alfa 156 and not have it go wrong very regularly.
We ran a 2K V6 from 100K to 135K, and it was a decent car for those 5 years.