I found this in my files. Sorry about the metrics.
On paper, the Chevrolet Captiva Captiva 3.0 LTZ has a lot going for it – 7 seats, all-wheel drive, a 190 kW 3.0L V6 engine, 6-speed autobox, aggressive good looks, climate control, and all the interior bells and whistles and luxury features one would expect.
In principle the Captiva, a crossover SUV developed by GM Daewoo, gives the best of both worlds – a Mom’s taxi/commuter during the week, and a weekend getaway vehicle. But after a few hours in each role, it became evident that the Captiva could be perceived to have some serious shortcomings.
First off, it is thirsty. Very thirsty. urban fuel consumption is (a claimed) 15.3L/100km, with a combined figure of 10.6, but despite my best efforts, and keeping the ‘Eco’ function on, I battled to get close to those figures – and most of my driving was done off-peak, so given the stop-start crawl of rush hour traffic, I’d expect worse.
Crawling is also a problem – in my experience, automatic boxes, once you’ve let your foot off the brake, will creep along with the engine idling. The Captiva didn’t, so a nudge on the accelerator was needed to get it, and keep it, moving.
The Captiva is big – two-and-a-half tonnes of big – but handles well round town and the suburbs, with speed-sensitive power steering and the all-wheel drive system allowing precise positioning on the road. It low speeds it is easy to manoeuvre, but again the need to nudge the throttle is a drawback, as is the absence of a handbrake – the on-off nature of the electric brake doesn’t allow for modulation.
Driver visibility is fair for a vehicle of this size, and the park-distance control is a boon, but the large c-pillars take a bit of getting used to. Interior space is ample – even in the ‘occasional’ third row of seats, but going for the 7-seat option obviously sacrifices the majority of the luggage space.
But holiday-time ‘five-up with luggage’ seems to be the task ideally suited for the Captiva, so I was looking forward to an extended trip to see how it would fared as a motorway cruiser.
After topping up the 65-litre tank – 180km driven, 28 litres used. Ouch. – I set out on the N1 for Paarl, and initially things went well. But once at motorway speeds, I started having serious doubts about the engine/gearbox combination. With 288Nm on tap, getting those bursts of acceleration for overtaking should have been a doddle. It wasn’t. At around 100km/h, a push at the accelerator produced a jump in the revs as the box cogged down, a bit of noise, and barely a flicker on the speedometer needle. So push harder – and the next cog down comes into play, the engine screams up a few thousand revs, and the Captiva starts to pick it up. But not significantly, which means any passing manoeuvre is going to have to be well planned.
As pilot-in-command Sarel mentioned, this alone would make a busy Easter weekend journey a nightmare ‘unless you were the one at the front of the queue’.
Which is a shame, because the Captiva is an attractive, well-built vehicle, with a lot to offer. Maybe the diesel option – a 135kW 2.2L with 400Nm – would be better suited to the box? And definitely more economical.
Chevrolet Captive 3.0 AWD LTZ.
As tested: R454 600.
Warranty & Roadside Assistance - 5 years/120 000km
Anti-Corrosion - 5 Years/Unlimited km
Service Intervals - 12 Months/15 000km
Service Plan - 3 Years/60 000km
We also gave it to our 'tame racing driver', Sarel van der merwe, who doesn't mince his words.
tinyurl.com/d2npla9
Sarel says
“The gear ratios are up to ****, totally, across the range, and the hunting is totally irritating. The engine is very noisy, and the performance doesn’t warrant the noise the engine makes.
The styling I like, but then you just get that cheap feel the moment you get in, especially on the dashboard, where the plastic doesn’t stop.
I don’t know exactly where it is supposed to be at that price – it is very expensive, for that kind of space you can buy better ands cheaper. It is something I wouldn’t buy… or I’d look at a lot of other things before I bought one.
In fact it is a bit of a letdown because you see them around often, and they look quite nice on the road, and it is a bit of a disappointment once you get behind the steering wheel.
The diesel engine could be the one to make a difference to the car.
It has plenty of space, and as a Mom’s Taxi it would work, but for sure I wouldn’t buy a V6 for a Mom’s Taxi.
One would also have to look at the Kia or Hyundai range, where the build quality is excellent, and the finish is better. The Chevrolet is still a bit of a Daewoo, regardless of the name change.
|