Motoring Discussion > Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! Miscellaneous
Thread Author: R.P. Replies: 5
View Threaded 

New Mon 30 Aug 10 11:04 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - R.P.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307327/Top-MoT-flops-A-quarter-3-year-old-Renault-Meganes-fail-test.html
Reply to this message | Report message
       
New Mon 30 Aug 10 11:11 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - -
Well thats amazing the Wail don't give any indication of reasons for failure to flesh out the juicy headline.
Reply to this message | Report message
       
New Mon 30 Aug 10 11:42 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - RattleandSmoke
Just don't get me started on this paper. It just hides the truth in a maor to provoke a reaction.

I am always annoyed at my parents for buying it, its just dribble in the same way as the Daily Star is.

The statistics would have been more helpful if it had the average repair cost of each car that was three years old too.
Reply to this message | Report message
       
New Mon 30 Aug 10 12:22 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - Bellboy
ooh look the daily mail are only 7 months behind thee
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8461394.stm
Reply to this message | Report message
       
New Mon 30 Aug 10 12:38 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - bathtub tom
Lies, damn lies and statistics spring to mind.

Perhaps it's more indicative of the type of people that buy the top models.

It's dangerous to eat spuds. A survey shows over 99% of drivers involved in accidents had eaten them in the previous twenty four hours. ;>)
Reply to this message | Report message
       
New Mon 30 Aug 10 17:51 
 Some MoT stats to discuss/argue about ! - madf
Any fool knows spuds rot your brains.. Look at the people who are grossly overweight. they all eat chips.

Says it all..
Reply to this message | Report message
       
Latest Forum Posts