>> I am confused. I thought the first number was the generation. i.e. in this example
>> the i5 is a generation´4´and the i7 is a generation´9´?
>>
>
>I think Z answered that above. The i"n" ratings are simply marketing positions within the range. >The nomenclature has been retained, but newer generations of the "n" range have overtaken the >performance of older generations of a higher "n".
I am not being clearer, I didn't mean to refer to the in; The two CPUs I quoted were..
i5-4200U @ 1.60GHz [so, Gen 4, no?] &
i7-940XM @ 2.13GHz [Gen 9?]
Yet it says that the i5 is better.
Sorry to harp on, but I do want to get this straight in my head.
|