>> >> That it's factually incorrect?
>>
>> The facts are one thing.
>>
>> How they're interpreted and reported is another.
You are 100% correct. And the Telegraph in general has an agenda which can quite clearly be seen in that article. That doesn't mean that there is no validity in that article, that there is no illuminating perspective or no informative points, but most definitely one must read it with a weather eye.
However, I would genuinely ask why you don't apply that perspective to articles from The Guardian, or anywhere else for that matter.
It is exactly the same thing.
|
