Harry is a weak character. Whilst his mother used the media against Charles, Harry does not like the media (I have some sympathy for this view). This may be a risky strategy - the media can easily destroy Harry.
Meghan has a history of damaged family relationships. As a successful actress she is also used to being the centre of attention. She may have found it difficult to subordinate her ego to the "royal" brand.
As an actress she will have rehearsed the words and bodylanguage for the interview for maximum effect. In this she has much in common with the well known Diana interview performance.
We have also heard only one side of the story - she may be lying, at the very least massaging the truth to communicate her message. The racism issue may have substance - or is she simply over sensitive - eg: ask a pregnant lady whether she want a boy or girl, she says a boy, sexist rage ensues, women are the equal of men, why don't you want a girl ...blah blah...
The royals are now little more than a brand - they have very little constitutional power. The Queen for more than 60 years has done a fantastic job in promoting the UK and communicating decent values.
Buck House will be keen to ensure the brand remains strong - the feelings of what are now minor royals will be a long way behind in second place.
|