<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<!--
  This web page is actually a data file that is meant to be read by RSS reader programs.
-->
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://www.car4play.com/xml/forum_posts.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<title>Car4play Forum Posts</title>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum</link>
<description>Car4play forum</description>
<language>en-gb</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:44:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright: Car4play</copyright>
<webMaster>webmaster@car4play.com (Technical)</webMaster>
<ttl>5</ttl>

<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Duncan) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687856</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:44:19 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> When working in business finance, one account was a local bookie who took a lot
>> of bets on their local team when playing a premier league team. 
>> 
>> Against all odds the locals won and the bookie honoured all bets made, even though
>> it took well over 50% of his net worth - i.e. selling the house territory
>> - because he knew that if he didn't, he wouldn't have any returning customers. 

Then said bookie was a silly billy. He should have laid the bets off. </description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687856&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (CGNorwich) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687846</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:29:09 +0100</pubDate>
<description>Presumably the punter  has raised this with theIndependent Betting Adjudication Service (IBAS). 
I wonder what the outcome is  A follow up post would be interesting


</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687846&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Andrew-T) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687844</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:19:38 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> To be fair since bookies live on their reputation they are normally fair. I suspect we don’t know the full story here. >> 

>> Most of them are chains or online and give not one jot about their reputation. Complaints about not paying out are common. >>

Presumably they gamble on some punters giving up, accepting that 700:1 is good odds anyway, and the others won't bother going to law which would put them out of pocket another way ?</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687844&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Dave) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687811</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:04:48 +0100</pubDate>
<description>Sounds like Stevie the bookie from Still Game when he didn’t payWinston’s winnings and did a runner.</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687811&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Zero) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687804</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:03:37 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> 
>> 
>> To be fair since bookies live on their reputation they are normally fair. I suspect
>> we don’t know the full story here.

Most of them are chains or online and give not one jot about their reputation.   Complaints about not paying out are common.</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687804&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (zippy) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687801</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:07:18 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> Are gambling debts still 'debts in honour only'?. 

No, I believe 2005 Gambling act changed that. 

You see a lot of news stories about bookies not paying out because of glitches. Never hear of punters being refunded the other way though ;-|</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687801&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (zippy) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687799</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:03:23 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> To be fair since bookies live on their reputation they are normally fair. I suspect
>> we don’t know the full story here.
>> 

This is very true for independents. 

When working in business finance, one account was a local bookie  who took a lot of bets on their local team when playing a premier league team. 

Against all odds the locals won and the bookie honoured all bets made, even though it took well over 50% of his net worth - i.e. selling the house territory - because he knew that if he didn't, he wouldn't have any returning customers. </description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687799&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (bathtub tom) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687797</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:10:27 +0100</pubDate>
<description>Are gambling debts still 'debts in honour only'?. 
i.e. the bookie can welch on a bet, but if the punter does, they get a 'visit'. </description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687797&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Robin O'Reliant) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687795</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:27:22 +0100</pubDate>
<description>>> 
>> 
>> To be fair since bookies live on their reputation they are normally fair. I suspect
>> we don’t know the full story here.
>> 

I'm a regular punter and I've never had a problem, either in shops or on course. Back in the seventies when I first took an interest in horse racing their were some dodgy characters about, but now even racecourse bookies pay out with a smile and a "Well done".</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687795&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (CGNorwich) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687794</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:20:29 +0100</pubDate>
<description>

To be fair since bookies live on their reputation they are normally fair.  I suspect we don’t know the full story here.</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687794&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Zero) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687793</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:20:14 +0100</pubDate>
<description>Its a common ploy, sorry con</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687793&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (Robin O'Reliant) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687791</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:02:02 +0100</pubDate>
<description>I would not stand for that. Provided he filled the betting slip correctly any fault with their system is their problem.</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687791&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bookies - the new conmen (zippy) : Non-motoring</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">car4play687789</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:33:30 +0100</pubDate>
<description>A mate of mine bets £1 a day on the nags at a bookies in the high-street. He always does accumulators and whilst he has the odd win - he mostly loses. 

Last week he got a sizeable win, about £3,500 on a £1 bet. The major chain bookie has offered him £700. 

His ticket confirms the odds and guarantee of the best odds. They are saying it wasn't put in to their system correctly and the £700 is all that they can pay. 

Crooks!</description>
<link>http://www.car4play.com/forum/post/index.htm?m=687789&amp;v=e</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>