> I understand why you think that. I disagree, primarily on basis of fact he was
>> here well before adulthood but I'd also like to know more about the offence We
>> don't know if wrench was used with malice aforethought or as a weapon that fell
>> to hand.
I don't see how you could have a policy based on something so subjective. I'm not sure it's practical looking into someone's mind at the time of the offence. It surely would create a round of near endless appeals based on previous wholely subjective policy. At least with the 12 month prison sentence as the threshold it's clear, simple and obvious. And it's not as if we are chucking people out for forgetting to pay a parking ticket
|
