>> no matter how well constructed any counter argument is put.<<
But it never is. All that happens is that it's always someone else's fault, someone else's problem and someone else who has to change to solve the cyclists problem.
They have now decided to design a lorry to avoid them...who pays for this design?
The Road Haulage industry certainly can't afford to...shall we put a tax on cyclist to pay for it?
Oh no, that would be unfair to cyclist... and of course, they are not part of the problem, are they?
Pat
|