>> so perhaps you
>> were ahead of the game.
>>
IIRC the subject had got the personnel people's radar after an expensive court case. Policy was being formulated and there'd been stuff in the 'weekly bulletin' on the issue. The board's question was probably coming from two angles. Firstly to find out if the chap from an outer London court was aware of an 'HQ' issue and only secondarily to see how I'd deal with the bailiff/clerk stuff.
>> And inappropriate is subjective and people will quite honestly draw the line in different places.
>> its not even a reasonable guideline.
Pretty much any word is going to have an element of subjectivity, or to put it another way each case will be fact dependent.
|