When you say "you've got previous", I assume that some trendy, pseudo Sweeney-esque phrase meaning that somebody has done the same before? No chance you could go for something a little less grating?
RO'R said
"Women are propositioned by men every minute of the day (And vice versa). In the vest majority of cases the man is older than the woman in a relationship, and no matter what the alleged power imbalance might be provided no is taken for an answer when given and it does not persist to the discomfort of the woman involved their is no case to answer."
For the life of me I cannot see what is wrong with that paragraph. Have you never been propositioned? Have you never propositioned another? I'd assume so. Was that proposition not a leap in faith?
I propositioned a woman *much* younger than me, it was in the workplace, she worked for someone who worked for someone who worked for someone who worked for someone who reported to me.
We've been married a long time and have lovely children together.
So was that right or wrong? Because I'd only got a hope for what she'd say, and I've been wrong about pretty much everything else she'd say since.
But if she'd declined, it would have ended there and I would have accepted her decision. Despite the fact that never mind her own job, I could have closed or kept open her entire country operation if I chose without really needing to justifying it to anybody, and she knew that was why I'd been sent.
What, exactly, is wrong with that?
I'd guess you're back to "sniffing" again.
Men and women, and other combinations, interact. At times we find each other attractive. At times that's at work. I can see no harm as long as it is genuine and there are no inappropriate implications.
p.s. As it happens, I can't remember Mr. O'Reliant ever excusing sex offenders. Perhaps you mean that he has a habit of pointing out the utter ridiculousness or your position at times?
|