View of the situation from a site which doesn't follow the Guardian party line:
" Sadiq Khan has dangled red meat to the unions over Uber since he became Mayor. The ban this morning was the second time the popular ride app service has been whacked by him. Why, you might ask, is Sadiq so keen to inconvenience the millions of Londoners – and potential voters – who use and enjoy the Uber app?
Electoral Commission records show that in 2015, Sadiq received almost £100,000 from three anti-Uber trade unions.
GMB: £20,000
TSSA: £15,000
Unite: £60,000
All three unions welcomed the decision today, they have been campaigning against new entrants into the taxi market for years. Limiting competition for taxis in London might hurt consumers, on the other hand it helps these powerful unions who are busily recruiting London cabbies to their ranks. Sadiq is paying them back ahead of passing the hat around next year for donations when he seeks re-election.
Sadiq has also burdened Uber with conditions attached to the Private-Hire Operators licence to which other operators are not being held. The last Uber London licence had 20 regulatory requirements, whereas other app based operators have no more than 9. Sadiq is singling out Uber for political reasons…"
License was withdrawn 2years ago, but magistrates held the cancellation for two years to let Uber correct the problems.
They're appealing again, and can operate until the appeal is heard.
I'm a long way from London, so I don't know what the frequency of issues is - is it significant.
It seems to me that the London minicab system doesn't work as well as the Private Hire licensing system elsewhere - again not based on a thorough experience in the capital.
|
