>> But there is no "international law" in the global sense, its an agreement between nations,
>> that any nation can tear up. Many nations do, there is no enforcement or legal
>> comeback other than a refusal to deal with that nation again.
Maybe somebody should tell the Justice Secretary.
I don't have the credentials to argue it. There's the ICJ I suppose, and other contextual treaty arrangements such as WTO. Perhaps it is obfuscation like this that the government thinks it can rely on but it still seems to me like saying you had your fingers crossed when you signed it so it doesn't count.
It seems to be dividing the Conservatives somewhat. Looks as if Johnson might have to eject a few more rebels.
|
