>>Why should we? He seems to be notorious for taking a hardline attitude to other people.
Because if you treat him no better than he treats others, how are you any better than him?
I think, though, a guideline is just that, a guideline. And guidelines can be outweighed by circumstances.
In this case Sweden is not in lockdown, people have been "urged to avoid" unneccessary travel, not banned from doing it, and not to make new contacts during a journey or at the destination.
But still people are baying for his job.
Why is absolutely anything we don't like reason for their dismissal? Why are we, as a crowd, almost terrified that someone may be getting some advantage or leeway that we're not?
Or are people not really like that and it's more sensationalist media dross?
|