The way that they communicate with me is of no consequence, I am temporary.
Usually helping a company change is the solution to most of their issues. Helping them to understand the importance of change, how to change, and why it will be good for them, as individuals, to change.
"Sorting them out" as an action is not a significant part or a project, it is more the result.
Typically in closed minded, protective, and insular organisation the way they communicate is both key to what s going on, a cause of it, and a block to it changing. It is part of an attempt to protect and continue the status quo without interference or outsiders.
As I said, such language is normally as a result of a clique, and for the perpetuation of that clique. It is a way to show one's superiority, the 'specialness' of a group or some other communication of an exclusive group.
None of that is healthy in the work place.
And, in my experience, it absolutely abounds in the Civil Service and amongst civil servants.
You may disagree.
|